The Three-Cornered War: The Union, the Confederacy, and Native Peoples in the Fight for the West

The Three-Cornered War: The Union, the Confederacy, and Native Peoples in the Fight for the West

  • Downloads:3609
  • Type:Epub+TxT+PDF+Mobi
  • Create Date:2021-02-17 04:25:03
  • Update Date:2025-09-06
  • Status:finish
  • Author:Megan Kate Nelson
  • ISBN:9781501152559
  • Environment:PC/Android/iPhone/iPad/Kindle

Summary

A dramatic, riveting, and “fresh look at a region typically obscured in accounts of the Civil War。 American history buffs will relish this entertaining and eye-opening portrait” (Publishers Weekly)。

Megan Kate Nelson “expands our understanding of how the Civil War affected Indigenous peoples and helped to shape the nation” (Library Journal, starred review), reframing the era as one of national conflict—involving not just the North and South, but also the West。

Against the backdrop of this larger series of battles, Nelson introduces nine individuals: John R。 Baylor, a Texas legislator who established the Confederate Territory of Arizona; Louisa Hawkins Canby, a Union Army wife who nursed Confederate soldiers back to health in Santa Fe; James Carleton, a professional soldier who engineered campaigns against Navajos and Apaches; Kit Carson, a famous frontiersman who led a regiment of volunteers against the Texans, Navajos, Kiowas, and Comanches; Juanita, a Navajo weaver who resisted Union campaigns against her people; Bill Davidson, a soldier who fought in all of the Confederacy’s major battles in New Mexico; Alonzo Ickis, an Iowa-born gold miner who fought on the side of the Union; John Clark, a friend of Abraham Lincoln’s who embraced the Republican vision for the West as New Mexico’s surveyor-general; and Mangas Coloradas, a revered Chiricahua Apache chief who worked to expand Apache territory in Arizona。

As we learn how these nine charismatic individuals fought for self-determination and control of the region, we also see the importance of individual actions in the midst of a larger military conflict。 Based on letters and diaries, military records and oral histories, and photographs and maps from the time, “this history of invasions, battles, and forced migration shapes the United States to this day—and has never been told so well” (Pulitzer Prize–winning author T。J。 Stiles)。

Editor Reviews

One of Newsweek's 40 Must-Read Fiction and Nonfiction Books to Savor this Spring!

"Megan Kate Nelson has made an invaluable contribution to broadening our understanding of the Civil War in her riveting new book。。。 [It] is also a timely reminder that the Civil War in the Southwest was not just an interesting tidbit in the history of the American West — it was part and parcel of the confederate objective of creating an 'empire of slavery' that expanded to the west。。。 The book should be read not only by Civil War buffs and students of the American West, but by anyone who wishes to gain a deeper appreciation of American history that goes beyond the traditional lens。 It is a masterful synthesis of military and social history in one of the overlooked chapters of the American Civil War。"
LA Review of Books

“Based on extensive archival research, Nelson’s work expands our understanding of how the Civil War affected Indigenous peoples and helped to shape the nation。 Readers interested in the Civil War and Western history will enjoy this nuanced portrait of the era。”
Library Journal, starred

“Brisk and well-sourced。。。 Nelson effectively blends military history with a fresh look at a region typically obscured in accounts of the Civil War。 American history buffs will relish this entertaining and eye-opening portrait。”
Publishers Weekly

“[A] useful survey for readers interested in the Civil War in its short-lived southwestern theater。”
Kirkus Reviews

“Both engaging and unsparing。。。 [Nelson] balances the stories of individuals from all four groups with deft discussion of the big-picture issues。。。 The result is a gripping history that integrates the Southwest into broader histories of American expansion。”
Booklist

"Nelson's book sheds light on New Mexico's importance during the war。"
Albuquerque Journal, review

"Subtly argued and richly documented。"
Civil War Times

"A terrific read。。。 this is a very good telling of a story that is unknown to most Americans。"
The Reconstruction Era, blog review

“[A] useful survey for readers interested in the Civil War in its short-lived southwestern theater。”
Kirkus Reviews

"Of the several "western theaters" in the Civil War that stretched 1800 miles from Knoxville to Tucson, the events and significance of the once farthest west is least known or understood。 Union forces in New Mexico and Arizona repulsed a Confederate attempt to conquer this region and subdued the Navajos and Apaches in a successful effort to "reconstruct" the region into the United States。 Megan Kate Nelson's beautifully written account tells this important story。"
—James M。 McPherson, author of Battle Cry of Freedom: The Civil War Era

"In the 1860s New Mexico and the greater West experienced many civil wars。 With lucid storytelling, using nine remarkable characters, Nelson reveals a chaotic, desperate struggle of Union against Confederate, Native peoples against other Native peoples, and Natives on both sides。 This is the Civil War most Americans do not know and Nelson convinces us once again that the great conflict was about slavery and the winning the West with its land and resources。 Rarely is a Civil War book so readable and so new to our understanding。"
—David W。 Blight, author of the Pulitzer-prize winning Frederick Douglass: Prophet of Freedom

"A gripping tale of the Civil War in the West。 Exploring the interaction of a fascinating cast of characters during a time of immense change, Nelson reveals an all too human struggle for territorial control。 Shifting perspective between nine key characters — men, women, soldiers, and Native Americans — The Three-Cornered War brings this battle between peoples, armies, agendas, and the environment to living breathing life。"
—Joanne B。 Freeman, author of The Field of Blood and editor of Alexander Hamilton: Writings

"Far from the Civil War's famous battlefields, a handful of individuals decided the fate of a vast landscape。 In The Three-Cornered War, Megan Kate Nelson vividly portrays a complex struggle between peoples and armies—Navajo, Apache, Confederate, and Federal—over the mountains and deserts of the Southwest。 Fast-paced and suspenseful, Nelson's account shifts perspective from the Navajo leader Juanita to the civilian Louisa Canby, from the Chiricahua titan Mangas Coloradas to the Texan Bill Davidson, among many others, in a web of conflicting agendas and shared suffering。 This history of invasions, battles, and forced migration shapes the United States to this day—and has never been told so well。"
—T。J。 Stiles, author of the Pulitzer Prize-winning Custer's Trials: A Life on the Frontier of a New America

"Symphonic in scale, The Three-Cornered War blends masterfully the intimate and the epic, weaving the biographies of nine individuals into a story of peoples—Apaches, Texans, New Mexicans, Confederates, Navajos, Federals—whose tragedies and triumphs resonate in the West we know today。"
—James F。 Brooks, author of Captives and Cousins and Mesa of Sorrows

"The 'hree-Cornered War sheds a bright light on the forgotten intersection of America's westward expansion and its cataclysmic Civil War。 Full of irony, sharp character sketches and fast-paced battle scenes, Megan Kate Nelson's book should be read by anyone who wants to understand the roots of modern America — or just wants a gripping story, powerfully told。"
—Clay Risen, author of The Crowded Hour

From the Publisher

Download

Excerpt

Read an Excerpt

Chapter 1: Baylor
When Texas seceded from the Union in February 1861 and the Civil War began in earnest two months later, John Baylor had not thought he would end up in the deserts of southern New Mexico。 He had first volunteered for the Confederate Army in May, hoping to defend Texas from invasion or to take the fight to the Yankees in Virginia。 He had come to Texas from Kentucky as a teenager, part of a flood of migrants who poured into the newly established republic after it secured independence from Mexico in 1836。 His family had been lured by its rich, loamy bottomlands, the promise of booming cotton crops, and the right to own slaves。1 By the 1850s Baylor and his wife, Emy, were living near the south-central town of LaGrange, with some acreage in crops and a growing herd of cattle。2

Baylor liked the work, but he was a man on the make, always interested in new ways to make money and to gain the respect of his peers。3 In 1851, he ran for the Texas legislature and was easily elected。 He also began to read the law and was admitted to the state bar in 1853。4 He was proud of all he had achieved and saw his success as part of a family effort。

“Them Baylors,” he wrote to his sister Fanny in 1857, “may they never cease to have good luck until the poorest among them is worth millions。”5

Baylor saw his service in the Confederate Army as another opportunity to make his mark。 He was ecstatic about his appointment as lieutenant colonel of the 2nd Texas Mounted Rifles, and about their orders to secure the Union’s abandoned military installations in West Texas。6 In June 1861, Baylor and his men had traveled quickly along the San Antonio–El Paso Road。 Whenever they arrived at a fort, they left a company of soldiers behind to defend it before moving on。7 This process, along with a high rate of desertion, left Baylor with only about 350 soldiers when he finally arrived at Fort Bliss, on the far western edge of Texas, on July 5。8

According to his orders, Baylor was supposed to stay at Fort Bliss。 But after he had rested his men for two weeks, the Texans received word that a detachment of Union troops had left Albuquerque and was moving south along the Rio Grande。 Baylor was alarmed。 It looked like the Yankees were planning to invade Texas, and his men were the only force positioned to defend it。 He pondered his options。 The road from San Antonio was not yet strung with telegraph wires, and he did not have time to send a letter to headquarters asking for orders。 He did not know that at that moment, a dispatch was already on its way to Fort Bliss, instructing Baylor to make no attempt to move into New Mexico Territory until a senior officer arrived to take command。9 By the time that letter reached Fort Bliss, Baylor had already crossed the border。 He had decided that moving forward was better than standing still。 He would take responsibility for whatever resulted。10

Riding quietly through the desert on the night of July 24, 1861, John Baylor and three hundred men approached Fort Fillmore, the Union’s southernmost military installation in New Mexico Territory。 The fort was full of medicine, weapons, and food that Baylor and the 2nd Texas would need for the invasion of the Territory。 The plan was to surround the fort and then attack as the sun rose over the jagged peaks of the Organ Mountains。 They crept close to the fort in the early-morning darkness, but then Baylor heard Fillmore’s buglers begin to play the long roll, summoning the Union soldiers within to take up their arms。 He found out later that a deserter from his ranks had slipped away to warn the federals, and so the 2nd Texas had lost the advantage of surprise。 Disgruntled, Baylor abandoned his original plan and ordered his men to march toward the small trading town of Mesilla。11

A few miles north of Fort Fillmore, Mesilla was at the crossroads of the Southwest’s two most well-trafficked thoroughfares: El Camino Real de Tierra Adentro (“the Royal Road of the Interior Lands”), moving people north and south between Mexico and Santa Fe along the Rio Grande, and the Butterfield overland mail route, an east-west road linking Missouri and Los Angeles。 Mesilla was also the gateway to the region’s silver, gold, and copper mines。 Some had been worked for years by Hispano miners, while others, deep in Chiricahua Apache country, had just been discovered by Anglos。 If John Baylor could occupy Mesilla, the Confederates could control access to these mines, as well as traffic in and out of southern New Mexico。

As the 2nd Texas rode northward, they passed lush fields of corn and wheat, a pleasing sight to soldiers who had spent the past month traveling through the dusty brown tablelands of western Texas。 On the outskirts of Mesilla, the regiment turned onto the town’s main road, guiding their horses around deep holes dug out by Hispano artisans to make adobe bricks。 News of their arrival spread ahead of them, and by the time the Texans reached Mesilla’s central plaza, a crowd had gathered。 The Confederates halted。

“Viva!” someone shouted。 And then a chorus: “Hurrah!”12

The 2nd Texas dismounted, pleased with all of the “manifestations of joy” that greeted them on the streets of Mesilla。 Although the New Mexico legislature had declared for the Union, most of Mesilla’s Anglo residents had come from the states of the Confederacy, looking for their fortunes in the mines and finding other opportunities in frontier businesses。13 In November 1860, a handful of these citizens had held a mock election in the town plaza, voting overwhelmingly for Kentucky’s John C。 Breckinridge rather than the Republican Abraham Lincoln or the northern Democrat Stephen Douglas。 After the secession of Texas, Anglo miners, teamsters, and businessmen from southern New Mexico issued their own proclamation of secession。 They wanted to create a newly independent territory they called “Arizona,” with Mesilla as its capital。 The area was already so decidedly pro-Confederate by the time Baylor arrived that, as one Unionist reported, “this country is now as much in the possession of the enemy as Charleston is。”14

While the officers of the 2nd Texas sought out lodging and supplies for their men, John Baylor looked for a good place to establish his headquarters。 In the center of Mesilla plaza, the U。S。 flag came down and the Confederate flag went up。 The crowd cheered again。

When he occupied Mesilla on July 25, 1861, John Baylor became the first Confederate to lead a successful invasion of Union territory in the Civil War。 He did not have time to revel in this distinction, however。 Rising dust clouds to the east told him that Union soldiers from Fort Fillmore were on the move。 Baylor figured that even if the Texans were outnumbered, they had the advantage of a defensive position。 He ordered most of the 2nd Texas to leave their horses and move on foot to the southern edge of town。 He placed some of them along the road, others on the flat roofs of surrounding adobe houses, and the rest in corrals and cornfields。 Then they waited。

In the late afternoon, two riders came into view, carrying a flag of truce。 Baylor sent two of his most trusted officers to meet them, and soon they came galloping back。

“Major [Isaac] Lynde of the Union Army,” they informed him, “demands the unconditional and immediate surrender of the Texan forces。”

Baylor knew that his position was too strong to give in to such a demand。

“Tell Lynde,” he said to his officers, “that if he wants the town he must come and take it。” Turning to the soldiers gathered around him on the road, he added, “We will fight first, and surrender afterward。”15

Lynde’s couriers disappeared down the road。 Within a matter of minutes, two cannon shots hurtled toward Baylor’s line。 One exploded on the roof of a building and the other struck a tree, sending limbs and shards of bark flying。 Then the Texans turned to see a regiment of Union cavalry pounding down the road toward them。 Baylor waited until the federals were in range of his men’s shotguns and pistols before giving the order to fire。 The bullets ripped through the Union ranks, and in the ensuing chaos the Yankees wheeled their horses and rode back toward their own lines。

Baylor’s men fired at the retreating soldiers and then waited for another charge。 It did not come。 The scouts Baylor sent out reported that Lynde had taken his soldiers and his artillery back to Fort Fillmore。 Should the Texans follow? Baylor considered it, but then decided that the Union retreat might be a trap。 Better to return to Mesilla and prepare for a Union assault, which he was sure would come the next day。 When the Confederates marched back to the plaza, the townspeople once again emerged from their houses and stores to cheer them。 As his men celebrated throughout the night, Baylor reviewed the events of the day with satisfaction。 The Battle of Mesilla was not long, nor was it costly。 But the Texans had won。 The Confederate conquest of the West had begun。16

The day after the Battle of Mesilla, Baylor scanned the skies to the east, looking for a sign that the federals were marching toward him。 There was no movement in that direction。 He sent scouts out to see what the federals were up to, and they returned to report that Lynde’s soldiers were digging entrenchments around Fort Fillmore。 Baylor saw a chance to put his original plan back into action and sent for his artillerists, who were still at Fort Bliss。 The next day, the Texans would march again on Fillmore, and pound it into submission from the high sand hills between the fort and the Rio Grande。17

Once again, Baylor’s plans were frustrated。 On July 27, his scouts woke him at daybreak, reporting dust rising up fifteen miles away。 Baylor leapt out of bed, grabbed his field glasses, and climbed onto the flat dirt roof of his headquarters。 What he saw confirmed the scouts’ account: a large column of soldiers was making its way slowly toward the Organ Mountains to the east。 They were on a military road that led up and over the mountains and then north to Fort Stanton, another federal installation filled with valuable supplies。 The federals had to cross twenty miles of desert and then summit San Augustin Pass, which towered almost two thousand feet above the valley floor。 There was a silver-mining town called San Augustin Springs a few miles past the pass on the east side of the range; the troops would likely stop there to rest。 Baylor climbed down from the roof and ordered his command to prepare their horses and fill their canteens。 Instead of assaulting Fort Fillmore, they would chase down and intercept the enemy in the middle of the desert road。 They would force the retreating Yankees to fight or surrender。18

The 2nd Texas pounded out of the town and splashed through the Rio Grande。 A scout joined them on the eastern bank and informed Baylor that the federals had abandoned and partially burned Fort Fillmore, but its storehouse was still intact。 Baylor was delighted。 He sent a detachment of soldiers to occupy the fort and gather its supplies。19

Baylor led the 2nd Texas along the riverbank and then turned east onto the road to San Augustin Springs, lined with dark green creosote bushes。 As the sun rose up over the dark edges of the mountaintops, the Texans gained on the federals。 The sky was a nearly cloudless, vast expanse of blue and the temperature was climbing。 By noon it would be nearly ninety degrees。20

When the road reached the foot of the mountains, it pitched upward into a more extreme grade。 The federals’ wagon trains, at the rear of the column, slowed to a crawl, and Baylor passed them。 Farther on, Baylor halted his lathered horse and looked down from the saddle on a group of Union soldiers who had collapsed along the road。 Some were trying to crawl along a trail that led into a narrow cut in the mountains。 When they saw Baylor, they called to him through parched lips。

“Water,” they begged。 “Please。 Water。”

It was hard to believe that these U。S。 Army regulars, who were seasoned frontier soldiers, had succumbed to the most common of desert maladies: thirst。 The federals had carried only small canteens with them, and their water wagons lagged far behind, their wheels mired in desert sand。 They had been on the march for only ten hours, but they were already suffering from extreme dehydration。 Baylor had no love for Yankees, but he and his men dismounted and gave the collapsed men all of the water they had。 Then they declared them prisoners of war。21

Galloping to the top of the pass, Baylor and his men reined in as a breathtaking view opened up in front of them: miles of undulating foothills, dotted with brown and green desert scrub, easing down into the broad, bright white gypsum flats of the Tularosa Valley。 The Confederates turned away from the view and toward San Augustin Springs, which lay a few miles down the winding road。 What they saw here was just as astonishing as the valley vista。 The road, Baylor reported, “was lined with the fainting, famishing soldiers, who threw down their arms as we passed。”22 Baylor could also see, in the distance, two hundred Union soldiers forming into a ragged line of battle on the edge of town。 He gave the order to charge and the Texans dashed down the road。 The federals scattered。 Baylor pulled up, and as he did, he received a message that the Union commander wanted to meet with him。

Baylor walked into San Augustin Springs with a few of his officers and sat with Major Isaac Lynde。 The Union officer was disoriented, his white hair and beard matted with sweat。

“[I was] so much exhausted from fatigue and excessive heat,” Lynde wrote later, “that I could sit on my horse no longer, and I had to stop and dismount。” The pain in his head was so intense that he could barely open his eyes。 He had mismanaged the retreat from the start, ordering his soldiers to leave Fort Fillmore without preparing enough water supplies, and issuing a series of increasingly contradictory orders that resulted in chaos on the road。 The choice to head into the mountains rather than retreat northward along El Camino Real to Albuquerque was the wrong one。 Lynde had made all of the decisions。 He was clearly the one to blame for this disaster。 As he sat hunched in pain, it was Baylor who now demanded an unconditional surrender。 Lynde, convinced that “it was worse than useless to resist; that honor did not demand the sacrifice of blood after the terrible suffering that our troops had already undergone,” agreed。23 The two men—one a professional U。S。 Army soldier with years of experience in desert warfare, the other a Texas rancher in command of a regiment for the first time—signed the articles of capitulation。24

Baylor and his men were forced to stay in San Augustin Springs for two days, until their prisoners (around four hundred soldiers and several civilians, most of them the families of officers) recovered from their dehydration and exhaustion。 Feeling magnanimous, Baylor offered the federals a chance to switch sides。

“All who take service with us in the C。S。A。,” he announced, “will be given $26 per month, a horse, saddle, and bridle, and all each can make besides。”25

A few of the Union soldiers took Baylor up on this offer, but most of them did not, and all of the officers refused。 What to do with his prisoners, then? While he would have relished the cheers that would greet him as he marched into Mesilla with his captives, Baylor did not have enough men to guard them。 And although the Texans now had Fort Fillmore’s salvaged supplies, the food and fodder would not last long。 The Mesilla Valley was fertile, but its crops could not sustain both the 2nd Texas Mounted Rifles and the Union prisoners。

“Being desirous 。。。 to afflict the enemy in every way,” Baylor took his prisoners to the Rio Grande and then let most of them go。 “It was much better for [the Yankees] to bear the expense of feeding [them], than for me to do so。”26

Baylor confiscated the federals’ weapons and horses and ordered them to march to Fort Craig, a Union installation 125 miles north of Mesilla。 From there they would head to Fort Leavenworth in Kansas, where they would muster out of the Union Army and never bear arms against the Confederates again, however long the Civil War should last。27 The Union parolees had two choices for their journey to Fort Craig: travel along the Rio Grande, which twisted in broad arcs through a narrow valley, or take the more direct route through the Jornada del Muerto (“Path of the Dead Man”), a ninety-mile stretch of scrubby desert with no springs, creeks, or sinks to sustain men or animals。 The Yankees, still reeling from their experiences on the Fort Stanton Road, chose the Rio Grande route。 It might be longer but at least they would have water。 As the federals turned northward, Baylor and the 2nd Texas turned to the southwest, toward Mesilla, which was now the headquarters of the Confederate campaign for the West。28

Three days later, Baylor sat down at a wooden table in his headquarters, placed a piece of paper in front of him, and dipped his pen in ink。

“I, John Baylor, lieutenant-colonel, commanding the Confederate Army in the Territory of Arizona,” he wrote, “hereby take possession of the said Territory in the name and behalf of the Confederate States of America。”

Arizona’s northern border was the 34th parallel and its western border was the Colorado River。 With this proclamation, the Confederacy now stretched from the Atlantic Ocean to California。

Baylor organized the new territorial government into executive and judicial departments and declared that the executive authority “shall be vested in the commandant of the Confederate Army in Arizona。” Baylor had contemplated running for governor of Texas in 1861 before the war broke out。 Taking up this post in Arizona seemed an even better opportunity for fame and fortune。 He would establish his government offices in Mesilla, which was now designated the territorial capital。 From there, Baylor would be able to see both friends and enemies coming for miles。29

Baylor sent one copy of his proclamation to Richmond and another to the Mesilla Times, a local newspaper founded by pro-Confederate Anglos in 1860。 He then penned a letter to General Earl Van Dorn, commander of the Confederate Department of Texas, describing the events of the previous week in New Mexico Territory。

“I have acted in all matters relating to the acquisition of Arizona entirely upon my own responsibility,” he wrote, “and can only refer the matter, through you, for the approval of the Government。”

Baylor assumed that President Jefferson Davis and the Confederate Congress would not object to his actions because, he noted, “the vast mineral resources of Arizona, in addition to its affording an outlet to the Pacific, make its acquisition a matter of some importance to our Government。”30 There was no question that Arizona Territory was essential to the Confederacy’s plans to reach California, and John Baylor had just cleared the way。 He was the vanguard of Confederate manifest destiny。

Word of the Battle of Mesilla, the Union surrender at San Augustin Springs, and the creation of Arizona Territory reached Texas a week later, and then spread throughout the Confederacy in the summer and fall of 1861。 Although he had acted without orders, Baylor’s victories pleased his superiors in San Antonio and Richmond。 Van Dorn immediately notified the War Department about Baylor’s “complete success” in his expedition, boasting of the prisoners and supplies that the Texas officer had taken。31 Confederate Secretary of War Judah Benjamin lauded Baylor’s success in his report to President Davis on the progress of the war in 1861。

“All the proceedings of Lieutenant-Colonel Baylor appear to have been marked by prudence, energy, and sagacity,” Benjamin wrote, “and to be deserving of high praise。 The result of his action has been the securing to the Confederacy a portion of the territory formerly common to all the States but now forming a natural appendage to our Confederate States, opening a pathway to the Pacific。”32

It was glorious news for the South。 Their empire of slavery appeared to be growing in the West, at the same moment that they had won the first major battle outside the town of Manassas, Virginia, in the East。

When John Baylor’s family heard about his victories, they were beside themselves。

“I can’t pretend to tell you all the compliments I have had on your brilliant success,” wrote his sister Fanny。 Their mother, she reported, had been campaigning among the local families in San Antonio to have “a report of the Missilla [sic] Battle published。”33

The residents of Mesilla reacted similarly, complimenting Baylor at every opportunity。 Robert P。 Kelley, the editor of the Mesilla Times, wrote on the day of the San Augustin surrender that the 2nd Texas had “changed our position from one of fear and anxiety to wild enthusiasm—the dread of armed oppression and outrage give place to the brightest hopes and most confident security。” Baylor’s victories had liberated southern New Mexico from the “Abolition despot,” the editor crowed, “the transition from darkness to light has been sudden, skillful, and glorious。”34

Baylor basked in the praise。 He worried, however, that his small force was not strong enough to occupy Confederate Arizona for very long。

“Now that I have taken possession of the Territory,” Baylor wrote to Van Dorn, “I trust a force sufficient to occupy and hold it will be sent by the Government, under some competent man。”35

While Baylor waited for an experienced soldier to take his place, he became fretful。 Yes, he had captured southern New Mexico and declared it the Confederate Territory of Arizona without much difficulty。 There were still innumerable threats to his position, however, from all directions。36 His scouts confirmed that thousands of Union Army troops were concentrating at Fort Craig。 Mexicans from Sonora, hearing of the chaos in New Mexico and sensing weakness on their northern border, were threatening to retake Tucson, which they had lost to the United States in the Gadsden Purchase in 1854。 Mescalero Apaches had attacked the small detachment of soldiers Baylor had sent to Fort Stanton, a former Union Army post nestled in the mountains in central New Mexico。 And Chiricahua Apaches were raiding wagon trains and mining camps along the Butterfield mail route in western Arizona。

Baylor became desperate for men to help him fight what he was sure would become a multi-front Civil War against Yankees, Mexicans, and Apaches。 Until these reinforcements arrived, the future of the Confederate West was uncertain。 Shaking off visions of disaster, Baylor wrote to Confederate officials in San Antonio, promising that “I will do all in my power to hold the country, against all odds。”37 He could not do much about the Yankees or the Mexicans without more Texas soldiers。 What he could do, however, was launch a successful campaign against Arizona’s Apaches。 John Baylor was a farmer, lawyer, legislator, military commander, and now a governor。 He had one other area of expertise: finding and killing Indians。

Reviews

Likes2Read

I was hoping/expecting a book that provided insights into and perspectives regarding a unique aspect of the Civil War that you rarely hear about。 Unfortunately this book is primarily a set of battle tales gleaned from pieced together diary notes from a few participants or observers with no real cohesiveness。 Assume its accurate, but suspect that some of the details are conjecture and/or embellished to add drama to the story。 Only redeeming quality is that it makes for a quick read。

Rita

Well researched and well written book about the battles in the territory of New Mexico and Arizona, between the Union, the Confederacy, and the Native Americans during the Civil War。 The author follows the lives of several different people, using diaries and a mountain of other resources, to paint a very good picture of the events in the area。 I became very interested in their lives and the outcomes。 My only complaint was that the kindle book I read had only a few maps, but I was able to view th Well researched and well written book about the battles in the territory of New Mexico and Arizona, between the Union, the Confederacy, and the Native Americans during the Civil War。 The author follows the lives of several different people, using diaries and a mountain of other resources, to paint a very good picture of the events in the area。 I became very interested in their lives and the outcomes。 My only complaint was that the kindle book I read had only a few maps, but I was able to view these areas on Google Earth。 。。。more

Dorothy Nesbit

A good book with lots of details about the civil war in the west。 Most troubling history of the treatment of the Navajo people through out this period。 Hard to keep the various people/plot lines straight through the book。

Jamie Bronstein

I wouldn't call this book "dramatic" or "riveting。" It was interesting, but Nelson seemingly couldn't figure out who her audience was。 If it was a general reader with little historical background on the Civil War, the book was choppy, as she chose to have each chapter told from the perspective of a different historical actor, and, seemingly, in that person's voice。 Moreover, the book becomes weirdly patronizing in the chapters told from the perspective of Native Americans, and slightly racist in I wouldn't call this book "dramatic" or "riveting。" It was interesting, but Nelson seemingly couldn't figure out who her audience was。 If it was a general reader with little historical background on the Civil War, the book was choppy, as she chose to have each chapter told from the perspective of a different historical actor, and, seemingly, in that person's voice。 Moreover, the book becomes weirdly patronizing in the chapters told from the perspective of Native Americans, and slightly racist in the chapters conveyed from the perspective of (for example) US army commanders。 I think the story of the Dine Long Walk, and the imprisonment at Bosque Redondo, is probably less well-known, and I appreciated the information。 As a historian with a decent background in the place and time, I found the book completely lacking in analysis--it's a flat narrative without a thesis that becomes entirely too attenuated among all the different voices。 Despite the real drawbacks with the book, I have assigned it to my graduate seminar this semester as a specimen of military history。 I will be interested to find out what the students think。 。。。more

Online-University of-the-Left

A good and illuminating read on a little-known feature of the Civil War period。 Obviously, it covers how both the Union and the Confederate forces arose and contending in the region。 But it also brings in the role of the enslavement of Native peoples by the 'Hispanos,' the conflicts between Native peoples among themselves, and between all of them, and 'whites,' siding alternately with the Yankees or the Rebels, as it helped or hindered them。 The most important is the struggle of the Navajo, and A good and illuminating read on a little-known feature of the Civil War period。 Obviously, it covers how both the Union and the Confederate forces arose and contending in the region。 But it also brings in the role of the enslavement of Native peoples by the 'Hispanos,' the conflicts between Native peoples among themselves, and between all of them, and 'whites,' siding alternately with the Yankees or the Rebels, as it helped or hindered them。 The most important is the struggle of the Navajo, and their desire to keep their homeland, and the role of William Tecumseh Sherman in bringing about a 'compromise,' where the Najaho got their land back, but have to submit their children to 'civilizing' schools as a price。 Beneath all of it, is the organizing force of the railroads and gold mines。 We need this in our ongoing quest to discover 'who we are' as US Americans, warts and all。 。。。more

Beth

Fascinating history。 A wonderful book。My husband was raised in New Mexico near Santa Fe, and knew nothing of the Confederate occupation of his favorite city。 Two-thirds of the book covers the history of the travails of the Navajo nation。 The author not only tells the history accurately, she even includes some of it from the point of view of the wife of a Navajo leader。 A point of view that is seldom related。 My husband and I both loved this book。 A great read。 Thank you。

Michael Reilly

At the beginning of the Civil War, Texas was part of the Confederacy, California was part of the Union and the whole area between them was the New Mexico Territory of the United States。 That territory is now the states of New Mexico, Arizona and part of Nevada。 This is the story of the Civil War in the New Mexico Territory。 The Confederates invaded the territory。 The Union drove them back to Texas。 The Union then spend the rest of the war fighting the various Indian tribes, primarily the Apaches At the beginning of the Civil War, Texas was part of the Confederacy, California was part of the Union and the whole area between them was the New Mexico Territory of the United States。 That territory is now the states of New Mexico, Arizona and part of Nevada。 This is the story of the Civil War in the New Mexico Territory。 The Confederates invaded the territory。 The Union drove them back to Texas。 The Union then spend the rest of the war fighting the various Indian tribes, primarily the Apaches and trying to set up a reservation。 Nelson focuses of nine people including Union, Confederate and Indian participants 。 She is very good at giving a sense of the flow of armies back and forth。 The Indians originally hoped that the war between white men would work to their advantage。 They were disappointed。 Nelson is sympathetic to the plight of the Indians but does not embrace the "noble savage" stereotype。 She works hard at showing the complicated humans on every side。 Nelson tells a good story。 This is straight forward narrative history about a little known corner of the war。 。。。more

Jonathan Frankel

Very interesting story - had trouble following the overlapping timelines of the chapters at first, but got used to it。 Recommended。

Ammon Cornelius

This is really a history of the American Civil War specifically within the New Mexico Territory, so don't expect a discussion of crucial events in the Utah Territory or Colorado, such as the Massacres of Bear River and Sand Creek。 Nelson is a captivating writer, and skillfully weaves the lives of nine different figures into a mostly coherent narrative。 As is routinely the case in American history, the most unfortunate losers are the Native Americans。 Nelson provides riveting accounts of the murd This is really a history of the American Civil War specifically within the New Mexico Territory, so don't expect a discussion of crucial events in the Utah Territory or Colorado, such as the Massacres of Bear River and Sand Creek。 Nelson is a captivating writer, and skillfully weaves the lives of nine different figures into a mostly coherent narrative。 As is routinely the case in American history, the most unfortunate losers are the Native Americans。 Nelson provides riveting accounts of the murder of Mangas Coloradas, an Apache chief, as well as the human displacement of the Navajo Nation。 I personally would have liked to see Nelson use more of these Native peoples' own oral histories, rather than a reliance on secondary materials。 Overall, a good introduction to an often-ignored and important theater of the Civil War。 Unlike many history books, it is clearly targeted toward a popular audience, and will therefore be accessible to most readers。 。。。more

Samlouras

A wonderful account of the West during the Civil War。。。。Having lived in Arizona, California and now Colorado, the book travelsthrough the hardships of the living (and dying) during that period of history。Fascinating accounts of the women, Native Americans and soldiers whofought for their lives & beliefs。 A great opportunity to brush up on ourearly history on the west side of the U。S。!

James Alexander

For years I’ve read bits and pieces about how the Civil War touched the Southwest, but never found anything that took it seriously。 This book goes into depth about how the Confederacy tried to capture Arizona and New Mexico, how the Union fought back and how the native population dealt with it。 After the Confederates lost, the Union spent the rest of the war solving the “Indian Problem” with soldiers and governors who had a mix of good and bad intentions - both of which ended up badly。 Well writ For years I’ve read bits and pieces about how the Civil War touched the Southwest, but never found anything that took it seriously。 This book goes into depth about how the Confederacy tried to capture Arizona and New Mexico, how the Union fought back and how the native population dealt with it。 After the Confederates lost, the Union spent the rest of the war solving the “Indian Problem” with soldiers and governors who had a mix of good and bad intentions - both of which ended up badly。 Well written and educational! 。。。more

Joe Schrock

Excellent overview of a critical but often forgotten part of our Civil War and overall dealings with Native Americans and Hispanics living in the new territories of the Southwest。

Jim Blessing

I've read numerous books about the Civil War, but wasn't able to get through with this one。 I've read numerous books about the Civil War, but wasn't able to get through with this one。 。。。more

Vaughn

Author uses stories of separate individuals to tell the bigger story and weaves the stories together nicely。 I wonder a little about something the author didn't discuss - the role of religion in actions taken by the various parties。 Author uses stories of separate individuals to tell the bigger story and weaves the stories together nicely。 I wonder a little about something the author didn't discuss - the role of religion in actions taken by the various parties。 。。。more

Randal Schmidt

Having read widely in history, over the years I've started to notice a trend with a certain type of book that promises far too much and that from the outside seems to present itself as an insightful examination of a broader topic with a new perspective, but inside turns out to be a tediously narrow presentation of facts on a subject that is not so much obscure as it is boring。So it is with this book。The title is misleading and the blurb from the publisher is laughable in its misrepresentation of Having read widely in history, over the years I've started to notice a trend with a certain type of book that promises far too much and that from the outside seems to present itself as an insightful examination of a broader topic with a new perspective, but inside turns out to be a tediously narrow presentation of facts on a subject that is not so much obscure as it is boring。So it is with this book。The title is misleading and the blurb from the publisher is laughable in its misrepresentation of the scope of this book: it should have been called "New Mexico in the Civil War。"Had it been titled as such, the book is not bad。 It is not very insightful and doesn't attempt much of an analysis or shed any new light, but it is a decent enough read。 What it is not is a broad look at the West and its place and meaning in Civil War history。 It's a shame that the book is not advertised more truthfully。 。。。more

Shrike58

My initial response to this narrative history was to second guess myself as to whether it was worth my time, as I feared that it was just going to rehash material covered by Alvin Josephy decades ago。 Not to mention that I've seen the use of disparate personal narratives as the tent poles for a wider story often come to grief。 However, my interest was peaked when it turned out that Nelson was going to use the perspective of John Clark, Lincoln's appointment as Surveyor General of the New Mexico My initial response to this narrative history was to second guess myself as to whether it was worth my time, as I feared that it was just going to rehash material covered by Alvin Josephy decades ago。 Not to mention that I've seen the use of disparate personal narratives as the tent poles for a wider story often come to grief。 However, my interest was peaked when it turned out that Nelson was going to use the perspective of John Clark, Lincoln's appointment as Surveyor General of the New Mexico Territory, as one of her voices, as this is not a typical choice; the surveyor general of a given territory being a then important but now obscure position。It turns out that this book is a bit narrower than I thought it was going to be, and that's a good thing。 Sure, you will get coverage of the "organized" war between the Union and the Confederacy, but that was of short duration。 The real war for both Confederate and Union forces was with the Apache and Navajo nations。 The contrast there might be best illustrated by looking at the relevant men Richmond and Washington had on the scene; John Robert Baylor and James Carleton。J。R。 Baylor started out well in terms of protecting Confederate interests in New Mexico, but he was as fine an example of a Jacksonian thug in a frock coat as you might find, and had no interest in being an administrator。 His solution to the challenge of the Apache resistance was annihilation, but he was mostly too easily distracted to carry through, and satisfied himself with a raid into Mexico where he killed one household's aging house servants; they were Apache, so why not? Jefferson Davis wound up having to write letters of apology over that incident, though Baylor never suffered any real consequences。Carleton, on the other hand, was a by-the-book U。S。 Army officer who is ill-regarded for his role in presiding over the Navajo "Long Walk," an actual death march and failed exercise in "productive" detention that was thankfully resolved by allowing the Navajo survivors a reservation on their traditional territory。 Carleton actually comes off somewhat better in Nelson's narrative than I've usually seen, as he genuinely had some positive intentions, but refused to allow reality to temper the imperatives he was trying to satisfy。I'm probably not the person this work was aimed at but I found it worth my time and can recommend it to the the general reader, particularly if you want a story that takes non-white voices seriously。 。。。more

Mark

A good book about a neglected part of the Civil War。 It opens your eyes to the brutal treatment of the Native Americans and also to the ultimate treatment of Hispanic Americans。 It makes you reconsider history。

Greynomad

Couldn't get through the dialogue。。。。。。。。 Couldn't get through the dialogue。。。。。。。。 。。。more

Andy Barnett

Great look at a little known side of the Civil Wra。

Mary

I thoroughly enjoyed and learned from this book。 It would be a great book to use in high schools and colleges in the southwest, as it portrays an important period that is often overlooked or glossed over。 As a Coloradan, the victory of the Northern troops at Glorietta Pass is often thrown around as the day "Colorado whipped up on Texas," but the larger story of the South's attempt to take the rich goldfields of Colorado (and California), and the wildly unfair use of the US Army to remove the Nat I thoroughly enjoyed and learned from this book。 It would be a great book to use in high schools and colleges in the southwest, as it portrays an important period that is often overlooked or glossed over。 As a Coloradan, the victory of the Northern troops at Glorietta Pass is often thrown around as the day "Colorado whipped up on Texas," but the larger story of the South's attempt to take the rich goldfields of Colorado (and California), and the wildly unfair use of the US Army to remove the Native peoples from their land, are important historic moments that continue to resonate today。 。。。more

Sally

Excellent premise from nine points of view。 Very interesting and informative。

Donna

4。5 starsAs the Civil War was just starting in the East, things on the Western front were heating up, too。 On July 24, 1861, while the Battle of Manassas had yet to be fought, John Baylor occupied the important crossroads town of Mesilla in the New Mexico Territory。 In doing so, he became the first Confederate in the Civil War to successfully occupy Union territory。 The battle of Mesilla and others that followed at Valverde, Apache Canyon, and Glorieta Pass were fought to gain control of the Wes 4。5 starsAs the Civil War was just starting in the East, things on the Western front were heating up, too。 On July 24, 1861, while the Battle of Manassas had yet to be fought, John Baylor occupied the important crossroads town of Mesilla in the New Mexico Territory。 In doing so, he became the first Confederate in the Civil War to successfully occupy Union territory。 The battle of Mesilla and others that followed at Valverde, Apache Canyon, and Glorieta Pass were fought to gain control of the West。 New Mexico Territory was especially critical to both the Union and the Confederacy for the access it provided to California’s gold and ports。 But the indigenous people living off of their ancient land had a huge stake in controlling it as well。 Navajos and Chiricahua Apaches formed the third corner in the “three-cornered war” that Megan Kate Nelson describes in this fascinating history。 After the Union troops successfully pushed the Confederates back into Texas, they began forcefully and systematically to remove the Natives from the territory。Nelson has written a well-researched and dramatic narrative history about a lesser known Civil War theater。 What makes this account all the more interesting is that she tells the larger story of the war through the lives of nine individuals who were swept up in the events that unfolded。 In addition to Baylor, these included among others: Kit Carson, the famed frontiersman; James Carleton, organizer of the “Indian wars” and champion of the failed Bosque Redondo Reservation; Apache chief and resister, Mangas Coloradas; and my favorite, Alonzo Ickis, a young Iowan farmer turned gold miner who joined the Union Army and kept a colorful journal of his experiences。 As always, I could have used more maps。 。。。more

James Bechtel

Megan Kate Nelson's "Three-Cornered War" is an appropriate description of the Civil War in the New Mexico Territory - present-day New Mexico and Arizona。 The Union and the Confederacy were concerned to control the gold and other resources of the West and especially California。 Soon, the implementation of a southern transcontinental railroad could begin - a major thoroughfare between Los Angeles and New Orleans。 Keep in mind the Gadsden Purchase from Mexico in 1854 added territory more favorable Megan Kate Nelson's "Three-Cornered War" is an appropriate description of the Civil War in the New Mexico Territory - present-day New Mexico and Arizona。 The Union and the Confederacy were concerned to control the gold and other resources of the West and especially California。 Soon, the implementation of a southern transcontinental railroad could begin - a major thoroughfare between Los Angeles and New Orleans。 Keep in mind the Gadsden Purchase from Mexico in 1854 added territory more favorable to a southern route。 Both sides had significant strategic interests here。 And so did the Indigenous peoples - the Apache and Navajo。 Hence, a three-cornered war。 Ms。 Nelson's use of the diaries, letters, experiences of about nine participants (Union, Confederate, and Indigenous) in the struggle makes for very interesting reading。 Slavery in the Territory played a key role。 Confederates supported the expansion of the institution of slavery - including Indigenous slavery。 The Union? During Reconstruction, it "was unclear what it would take to abolish Indian slavery in New Mexico once and for all。。。。 The Republicans clearly did not see Indian slavery as the same sort of immoral system as African-American enslavement。 They took the same stance they had since 1863, fighting simultaneously for black emancipation and indigenous incarceration。 Both practices served their ultimate goal, to take possession of the lands of the entire continent, and give them over to free laborers。" (p。 229)。 I am taking "incarceration" for "reservations。" This chapter examines the negotiations between Navajo leaders and General WT Sherman over whether the Navajo will live at Bosque Redondo reservation (more of a wartime concentration camp) or their original homeland of Dine Bikeyah。 The agreed-upon decision is their homeland。 However, a few pages later in the Epilogue, she makes a different conclusion。 "These struggles for power in the West exposed a hard and complicated truth about the Union government's war aims: that they simultaneously embraced slave emancipation and Native extermination in order to secure an American empire of liberty。" (p。 252)。 Incarceration or extermination? 。。。more

Mike

This is a very readable history of the Southwest during and immediately following the Civil War。 I have read a few other histories of these events。 All of them deal with the North vs the South or the Union Army vs the Apache or Navaho。 This books does both。 Normally I find such books overreach。 I was impressed that Ms。 Nelson put everything into a single book and show the historical perspective of the time。 The detail in the book is sufficient for the type and length of the book, but if you want This is a very readable history of the Southwest during and immediately following the Civil War。 I have read a few other histories of these events。 All of them deal with the North vs the South or the Union Army vs the Apache or Navaho。 This books does both。 Normally I find such books overreach。 I was impressed that Ms。 Nelson put everything into a single book and show the historical perspective of the time。 The detail in the book is sufficient for the type and length of the book, but if you want to get in depth detail you should read this first for perspective, and the other works later。 The thing that I appreciated the most is the lack of victimization and honest historical accounting of facts。 Confederates, Union soldiers, and Native Americans are portrayed realistically。 None of the major players are portrayed as total villains or total saints。 They are portrayed as people with good points and with flaws。 There is a significant attempt to show the reason people made decisions, whether flawed or not。 I find this to be a breath of fresh air。 。。。more

Joseph

The author takes a detail-oriented look at the Civil War in the far West。 I found this book to be captivating。 The narrative was brisk and flowed very smoothly without seeming forced or pedantic。 I learned several things from this book-always a plus in any endeavor, but especially in summer reading when the TBR stacks start looking ominous and foreboding。 Overall, a very meritorious effort and one of the better books I've read so far this year。 The author takes a detail-oriented look at the Civil War in the far West。 I found this book to be captivating。 The narrative was brisk and flowed very smoothly without seeming forced or pedantic。 I learned several things from this book-always a plus in any endeavor, but especially in summer reading when the TBR stacks start looking ominous and foreboding。 Overall, a very meritorious effort and one of the better books I've read so far this year。 。。。more

Alex

The Three Cornered War was an easy and interesting listen/read, where the author Megan Kate Nelson, illustrated the US Civil War in the Arizona and New Mexico territories by focusing on key figures of the the conflict。 I thought her approach was thoughtful, illuminating and useful for one to understand the region during this period。 However, I also felt the book lacked a certain historical depth that could have made understanding the topic better。 It was not until the conclusion that the author The Three Cornered War was an easy and interesting listen/read, where the author Megan Kate Nelson, illustrated the US Civil War in the Arizona and New Mexico territories by focusing on key figures of the the conflict。 I thought her approach was thoughtful, illuminating and useful for one to understand the region during this period。 However, I also felt the book lacked a certain historical depth that could have made understanding the topic better。 It was not until the conclusion that the author really laid out the raison d’etre of the book and thus, the story sometimes plodded along in an unclear manner。 If you liked this, I would also highly recommend Blood and Thunder by Hampton Sides, which focuses on Kit Carson and the Navajo nation in this period。 。。。more

Michelle I。

I don't really love military history, but this account of the Civil War years in New Mexico and Arizona is required reading for anyone who's interested in the history of the Southwest or in Native American history。 Part of the book is about Civil War battles (and military buffs will get all the details of those campaigns), and this part was pretty boring to me but my husband who's into that enjoyed it。 But the rest of the book centers on the treatment of Navajo and Apache people。 Very sad histor I don't really love military history, but this account of the Civil War years in New Mexico and Arizona is required reading for anyone who's interested in the history of the Southwest or in Native American history。 Part of the book is about Civil War battles (and military buffs will get all the details of those campaigns), and this part was pretty boring to me but my husband who's into that enjoyed it。 But the rest of the book centers on the treatment of Navajo and Apache people。 Very sad history, but well told。 I especially appreciated the effort to bring in women's stories and the perspectives of lowly soldiers and other individuals。 It is obvious that this author took a deep dive into the archives to write a new kind of Civil War history。 Listened to the audiobook on a long drive toward the Southwest, and it is a pretty good narration。 。。。more

Peg Albrets

really interesting book about the Civil War in the west。。。I had no idea。

Dave N

I have a thing for histories that focus on individuals as a way to explain the intricacies of the past, and this book scratches the itch as well as anything else I've read for a while。 This book also served a second purpose in providing some context around the events of Cormac McCarthy's Blood Meridian, which is what drew me to it in the first place。 However, I came to appreciate the book for more than just background information; I came to realize that the story of the Civil War in the West was I have a thing for histories that focus on individuals as a way to explain the intricacies of the past, and this book scratches the itch as well as anything else I've read for a while。 This book also served a second purpose in providing some context around the events of Cormac McCarthy's Blood Meridian, which is what drew me to it in the first place。 However, I came to appreciate the book for more than just background information; I came to realize that the story of the Civil War in the West was an important aspect that, up until then, I hadn't known much about, despite having read a decent amount on the War (for a layperson, anyway)。 What was interesting is that these stories, which took place in Texas, Arizona and New Mexico, for the most part, seemed to mimic a lot of the stories I remember reading about Civil War battles and movements back East, and that the inclusion of the Native Americans' perspectives is what stood out most。 。。。more

Stephanie Storey

LOVED this new perspective on the Civil War; seeing it as the west was impacted and impacted the rest of the war was fascinating and has forever changed my view of American history。 Plus, I just enjoyed the storytelling and the writing! Already on my "to re-read" list :) LOVED this new perspective on the Civil War; seeing it as the west was impacted and impacted the rest of the war was fascinating and has forever changed my view of American history。 Plus, I just enjoyed the storytelling and the writing! Already on my "to re-read" list :) 。。。more

Ray Ortensie

One word: AWESOME!